SOPX
Self-serve Pro plan with a free trial. No credit card and no demo call required to start. Custom enterprise plans available on request.
See SOPX pricing → SOPX vs
SOPX vs ScreenApp
ScreenApp turns a recording into a document you download. SOPX turns phone video of physical work into a structured SOP with an auto-trimmed clip on every step, then keeps it versioned, approved, and running on the floor.
Last reviewed: July 28, 2026 · Reviewed by Gregor Obreza
, Co-founder and CEO Comparison Summary
ScreenApp is an AI recorder and transcription platform with a free video-to-SOP generator, strongest on meetings, transcripts, and mobile capture. SOPX starts from a phone recording of physical work and returns a structured SOP: steps, step descriptions, and an auto-trimmed clip on every step, publishable in under 10 minutes and fully editable afterwards. Existing PDF procedures are parsed automatically into steps and images. The procedure then stays inside a system with version history, approvals, document IDs, comments, and Run mode execution records, rather than becoming a file you redistribute. For a manufacturing or food production team of 20 to 300 maintaining procedures on the floor, SOPX is the fit.
Feature Comparison
Side-by-side comparison of SOPX and competitor capabilities.
| Feature | SOPX | ScreenApp |
|---|---|---|
| Core | ||
| Primary product focus | An SOP system for operations teams. Video or PDF in, a structured procedure that is versioned, approved, translated, and executed on the floor. | An AI recorder and transcription platform. Screen and meeting capture, transcripts, summaries, and a large library of document generators, one of which produces SOPs. |
| What you have a month later | A living procedure. Edit a step, publish a new version, and everyone on the floor sees the current one at the same link. The old versions stay restorable. | A Word or PDF file. ScreenApp's own guidance for updating an SOP is to re-record and regenerate, then redistribute the new file. Keeping copies in sync is on you. |
| Physical process documentation | Core use case. Phone video of machine setup, changeover, maintenance, food production, or field service, with no narration required. | Advertised. Their SOP generator page names manufacturing teams documenting equipment operation and safety procedures. Their own how-to guide notes output quality on hands-on tasks depends heavily on clear verbal narration. |
| Video without narration | Expected input. The AI reads the visual work, so a quiet line, a noisy machine, or an operator who does not talk through the task still produces a usable procedure: titles, step descriptions, and an auto-trimmed clip on every step, ready to review and publish in under 10 minutes with no writing required. | The pipeline is transcription-led (Whisper Large-v3) with OCR for on-screen text. A silent shop floor recording gives the model much less to work with. |
| Step-level editing | The AI output is a working draft, not a locked artifact. Rewrite wording, reorder or delete steps, insert custom steps, and trim or replace the clip on a single step without regenerating the whole SOP. Also set thumbnails, swap in an image or carousel, add arrows, callouts, and text annotations, and build tables inside a step description. Steps can be imported from another procedure with clips and form fields intact. | The generated document is editable, mainly after export in Word, Google Docs, or Office 365. Per-step video clip trimming, on-frame annotation, and structured step objects are not part of the workflow. |
| PDF and document import | Yes, and it is automatic. Upload an existing PDF procedure and the AI parses it into steps and step descriptions, extracting the diagrams and photos into images and carousels on the right steps. No page-by-page rebuilding. | No. ScreenApp exports to PDF and Word but does not import an existing PDF procedure and turn it into a maintainable SOP. |
| Multiple sources into one procedure | Enterprise preview, unlocked per customer: up to 5 videos plus 5 PDFs reviewed together into one coherent SOP, each PDF marked as procedure source or background context. | One recording produces one document. Merging several videos and manuals into a single procedure is not a documented capability. |
| Version history and audit trail | Version history per SOP with restore, plus a read-only procedure history timeline (Pro and Enterprise) logging created, submitted, approved, changed, published, and restored with a name and timestamp. | Recordings and documents can be re-generated and re-uploaded. A per-procedure version history with restore and an automatic change timeline is not a stated capability. |
| Approval workflow | Yes (Pro and Enterprise, off by default). Draft, submit for review, approve and publish or request changes with a reason. A My Reviews queue per approver and an optional four-eyes rule blocking self-approval. | Not a stated capability. The product is capture-and-generate oriented, not publish-and-approve oriented. |
| Document control IDs | Yes, on every plan. Assign IDs like SOP-PROD-014 using your own numbering convention, carried across every version and language, with a non-blocking duplicate warning. Supports ISO 9001 Clause 7.5 document control. | Generated files have no procedural identifier. Numbering is whatever you type into the exported document. |
| Comments and review | Yes, on every plan. Comment on a whole procedure, a single step, or the procedure details block, with threaded replies and resolve. Comment-only access lets frontline staff flag a problem without edit rights. | Commenting happens in Word or Google Docs after export, or as chat over the recording. Comments are not anchored to a step of a published procedure. |
| Proof the work was done | Run mode attaches forms and checklists to specific steps: 10 field types including yes/no/na, number, date, choice, image, and signature, plus a closing note and signature per run. | No execution layer. A document tells someone what to do. It does not record that they did it. |
| Roles, workspaces, and access | Org roles (Owner, Admin, Creator, Member) plus share access levels (view, comment, edit, manage). Shared workspaces grant access by role, restricted workspaces scope procedures to specific people. | Team folders and sharing exist, with SAML SSO on Enterprise. Granular per-procedure access levels tied to an org role model are not documented. |
| Multi-language | AI translation of the SOP into 50+ languages with rich-text structure and tables preserved per step, plus a side-by-side editor to review and correct each translated step against the source. | Strong here. 99 languages for transcription and translation, with automatic language detection and real-time translation on mobile and web. The unit translated is the transcript, not a reviewable procedure. |
| Usage | ||
| Distribution to the floor | Link or QR code at the machine, plus a full screen mode that shows one step at a time for operators, and organization-wide search across all procedures. | Shareable links to the recording or the generated document, plus file downloads in Word, PDF, and PowerPoint. |
| Usage analytics | Who viewed and ran what and when, most popular procedures, public view counts, most active team members, and run results review. | Analytics tooling is listed among their feature categories, oriented to recordings and viewers rather than to procedure adoption or completion. |
| Meeting and call capture | Not offered. SOPX has no meeting bot, no call recording, and no transcript-first workflow. | Clearly better. Meeting bot for Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams, speaker identification, Ask AI chat over any recording, imports from YouTube, Loom, and Drive, and roughly 350 listed audio and video tools. |
| Mobile | Web only, no native app and no offline mode. On phone and tablet, Add image and Add video open the rear camera directly for capture inside the editor and in Run mode image fields. | Better. Native iOS and Android apps for recording, transcription, and real-time translation. |
| Security certifications | EU-hosted application and database with a documented data processing posture, but no SOC 2 or ISO 27001 certification to advertise and no published uptime SLA. SSO/SCIM and an organization audit log are Enterprise add-ons. | Better. SOC 2 Type II certified and GDPR compliant per their help documentation, with SAML SSO on Enterprise. |
| API access | Available as a paid Enterprise add-on, not included on Pro. | Included on the Business plan ($34 per user per month billed annually) and above, alongside white labeling. |
| Target audience | Manufacturing, food production, logistics, field service, labs, and healthcare operations. Teams of 20 to 300 documenting physical work. | Knowledge workers, sales and customer success, educators, students, content creators, and software teams capturing meetings and digital content. |
| Entry pricing | Free trial with 5 AI-generated SOPs and 3 AI translations, no PDF or Word export and no version restore. Pro is $9 per user per month billed annually or $12 monthly, self-serve Stripe checkout, no sales call. | Cheaper to start. Free plan with 3 recordings, 3 AI generations, and 1 transcription per month. Growth $19 per user per month billed annually, Business $34, Enterprise from $199 per month. |
Pricing model
How each tool prices and packages access.
ScreenApp
As of July 2026 ScreenApp lists a free plan (3 recordings, 1 transcription per month), Growth at $19/user/mo and Business at $34/user/mo billed annually, and Enterprise from $199/mo. SOPX Pro is $9/user/mo annual or $12/user/mo monthly, with an Enterprise plan priced by operation size.
SOPX is best for:
- Manufacturing and food production SMEs who record a machine setup, changeover, or quality check on a phone and want a structured SOP back in under 10 minutes, a description and an auto-trimmed clip on every step, no narration and no writing needed, because the camera has to do the explaining
- Teams sitting on a binder of existing PDF procedures: the PDF is parsed automatically into steps, descriptions, and extracted images, and from there it is maintained, edit a step, publish a version, and the floor is on the current one with the old versions still restorable
- Quality teams under ISO 9001 who need document IDs, an approval step before a procedure goes live, and a read-only history of who changed and approved what
- Teams that need evidence a procedure was actually followed, using Run mode forms, checklists, and signatures per step rather than a document nobody signs
- Multilingual shop floors that need every translated step reviewed side by side against the source, not just a translated transcript
ScreenApp might be better if:
- Teams that live in meetings and want a bot on Zoom, Meet, and Teams producing transcripts, summaries, action items, and searchable chat over every call
- People who record on the move and want native iOS and Android apps with on-device recording and real-time translation
- Anyone who needs a fast, cheap, one-off SOP or how-to document out of a narrated screen recording and is happy for the output to be a Word or PDF file
Ready to see SOPX in your workflow?
Free trial. No credit card. No demo required.
Migrating to SOPX
Two self-serve paths. Both run in your browser, no IT involvement needed.
Bring your existing PDFs
Export work instructions as PDF from your current tool, then drop them into SOPX. The AI extracts text, pulls images, translates if needed, and rebuilds them as structured SOPs in minutes.
Bring your existing process videos
Re-use any video you have already recorded. SOPX generates step-by-step SOPs from raw footage automatically. No re-recording, no manual editing.
Need API-based migration or a managed switch (for example, bulk export from a competitor's API)? We handle custom enterprise migrations on request.
Talk to us about migrationWhere SOPX fits next to ScreenApp
Teams comparing the two usually pick SOPX for video to sop , work instructions , or multilingual sops . These are workflows where ScreenApp's strengths sit in a different lane.
The pattern shows up most in manufacturing and food production , where the work happens off the screen and consistency across shifts and sites matters more than the documentation tool itself.
Frequently Asked Questions
Quick answers to common questions for this comparison.
What is the main difference between SOPX and ScreenApp?
ScreenApp is an AI recorder and transcription platform. It captures screens and meetings, transcribes them, and generates documents, including step-by-step SOPs that you download as Word, PDF, or PowerPoint. SOPX is an SOP system. A phone video or an existing PDF goes in, the AI returns a structured procedure with step descriptions and an auto-trimmed clip on every step in under 10 minutes, and that procedure stays inside the platform: fully editable steps, version history, approval before publishing, document IDs, comments, translation review, and Run mode records showing the work was executed. Put simply, ScreenApp is very good at producing a document. SOPX is built to keep that procedure correct and in use six months later.
Can ScreenApp document physical processes like machine setups or factory work?
Yes, and it advertises that use case: ScreenApp's SOP generator page names manufacturing teams documenting equipment operation and safety procedures. The caveat is in their own guidance, which states that output quality on hands-on tasks depends heavily on clear verbal descriptions, because the pipeline is transcription-led with OCR for on-screen text. SOPX is built for the opposite starting point: phone video of physical work with background noise, awkward angles, and no narration, where the visual content of the recording carries the procedure.
When is ScreenApp the better choice?
Three cases, honestly. First, if your real job is meetings and calls: ScreenApp's meeting bot for Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams, speaker identification, and Ask AI chat over any recording are far ahead of anything SOPX does, because SOPX does not record meetings. Second, if procurement requires SOC 2 Type II certification, ScreenApp has it and SOPX does not. Third, if you need one narrated screen recording turned into a Word or PDF file cheaply and occasionally, ScreenApp's free plan and $19 per user per month Growth tier cost less than running an SOP platform.
Does ScreenApp have approvals, version history, or document control?
Not as documented capabilities. ScreenApp's SOP guidance suggests updating a procedure by re-recording and regenerating the document, which means version control lives wherever you store the files. SOPX handles this inside the product: an optional approval flow with draft, submit for review, and approve or request changes, an automatic read-only procedure history logging every change with a name and timestamp, restorable versions, and document IDs such as SOP-PROD-014 carried across every version and language, which is what ISO 9001 Clause 7.5 document control expects.
Can either tool prove that a worker actually followed the procedure?
SOPX can, through Run mode. Forms and checklists attach to specific steps with 10 field types including yes/no/na checks, numbers, dates, choices, photo capture, and signature, plus a closing note and signature for each run. Analytics then show who viewed and ran what and when. ScreenApp produces a document, and a document does not record execution. If your reason for writing SOPs is audit evidence, shift handover, or reducing variation between operators, a downloadable file cannot close that loop no matter how quickly it was generated.
How does multilingual support compare?
ScreenApp is stronger on raw language coverage: 99 languages for transcription and translation, automatic language detection, and real-time translation in its mobile and web apps. SOPX translates a different unit. It translates the procedure itself into 50+ languages, preserving rich text and tables per step, and gives a side-by-side editor so a supervisor can check every translated step against the source before it reaches the floor. For a multilingual production line, a reviewed step is worth more than a broader language list on a transcript.
We already use ScreenApp for meetings. Should we use it for SOPs too?
Keep it for meetings. For occasional one-off guides from narrated screen recordings, it is fine there too. The point where it stops paying off is when procedures need to be maintained rather than produced: when a step changes and every printed copy on the floor is now wrong, when quality asks who approved the current revision, or when an auditor asks for evidence the procedure was followed. The two tools coexist easily. ScreenApp for capture and transcripts, SOPX for the procedures that govern physical work.
How does pricing compare in July 2026?
ScreenApp's pricing page lists a free plan (3 recordings, 3 AI generations, 1 transcription per month), Growth at $19 per user per month billed annually, Business at $34 per user per month billed annually with API access and white labeling, and Enterprise starting at $199 per month. SOPX Pro is $9 per user per month billed annually or $12 monthly, with self-serve Stripe checkout and no sales call, and a free trial covering 5 AI-generated SOPs and 3 AI translations. The SOPX Enterprise plan is priced by operation size, with branding, SSO/SCIM, audit log, and API as paid add-ons.
Ready to standardize SOPs faster?
See how SOPX fits your operations workflows and documentation standards.